Optional Reading List - Winter 2011

As part of a continuing series of recommended readings from the professors and students of Eastern Washington University's Urban and Regional Planning program, here is your latest optional reading list!

The works, and my understanding of them, are below. If the descriptions are inaccurate, then it's because I misunderstood and I'd appreciate a heads-up!

A Sand County Almanac, by Aldo Leopold, nonfiction recommended by Dr. Zovanyi. In a beautifully written series of essays about his observations of nature, Leopold expresses the importance of preserving the environment and his concept of the Land Ethic.

Our Ecological Footprint, by Williams E. Rees and Mathis Wackernagel, nonfiction recommended by Dr. Zovanyi. This is the book that defines the concept of our "footprint" and argues that our combined footprint is exceeding the planet's capacity to renew itself.

The Last Landscape, nonfiction by William H. Whyte recommended by Dr. Hurand. This book, published more than four decades ago, urges Americans to make better use of space. While others noted its importance at the time (Jane Jacobs called it "an excellent book"), it is relevant to today's sprawl-oriented nation searching for an alternative.

Ishmael, by Daniel Quinn, fiction recommended by Dr. Zovanyi. I reviewed this after I read it a few weeks back. It's a story about Mother Culture, and a challenge presented to her by a telepathic gorilla. No, it's not science fiction: it's a survey of human history and human present, and asks us to consider what the human future is going to be.

Integral Urbanism, by Nan Ellin, nonfiction recommended by Dr. Winchell. It documents the transition from mechanical, rigid modernistic architecture to humanist post-modern architecture and its application to New Urbanism.

Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, nonfiction by Herman Daly, recommended by Dr. Zovanyi. This is an economic treatise recognizing the upcoming change to the very nature of economics when the irrational assumption of unending growth is finally overthrown.

House Form and Culture, nonfiction by Amos Rapoport and recommended by Dr. Hurand. Amos Rapoport is an environmental psychology researcher, studying the complex interplay between how people change their environment and how the environment affects human behavior. In this work, he discusses the connection between the culture of a people and the kind of housing they construct.

The Levittowners, nonfiction by Herbert Gans and recommended by Dr. Hurand. The first infamous suburban development is studied to determine what kind of culture was being created in an extended area of mass-produced, identical houses.

The Big Burn: Teddy Roosevelt and the Fire that Saved America, nonfiction by Timothy Egan, recommended by, well, everyone. Just over 100 years ago, there was a spectacular fire here in the northwest in which an area the size of Connecticut burned in a weekend. The flames moved faster than a horse at full gallop. The frontier was officially closed by this point in American history, and Roosevelt was trying to ignite a tradition to conserve this nation's wild spaces. This work tells the story of the fire, and how it changed the way America treats its public lands.

"Mixed-income housing, successes for whom?"

Because you all know I'm a party animal, and I certainly wouldn't want to disappoint any of you, tonight I was reading an article entitled "The Role of Public, Private, Non-profit and Community Sectors in Shaping Mixed-income Housing Outcomes in the US."

Yes, I know! As one of my friends quipped when I mentioned it, "I can't wait until you're in charge." I'm with ya, but I'd rather have noble, workable ideas in charge, not people. Can such ideas be found here?

The article outlines the two types of goals revitalization efforts can pursue. First are place-based goals, such as building of "housing stock, business development, telecommunications, water/sewer/electric and roadways" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2358). The second type are person-based goals which are the "building of individual and social capital so that they may take advantage of economic opportunities (such as, job skills development, educational improvement, poverty amelioration and moving people into homeownership)" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2358).

(Sidebar: this was written in 2007, before the general public realized that home ownership isn't always an economic opportunity. On the other hand, researchers engaged in urban studies really should have known better.)

The authors posit that successful achievement of these goals depends on 1) agreement upon the goals of the program between the public, private, non-profit and community sectors; and, 2) sufficient organizational capacity to achieve the goals. In effect, they say that even if everyone agrees, it is not enough until everyone is has the managerial skills and monetary resources to achieve them. They also observe that place-based goals are most easily achieved through cooperation between the private and public sectors and person-based goals are best achieved through cooperation between the non-profit and community sectors.

The article documents two neighborhood revitalization projects, one in Durham, North Carolina, the other in Chattanooga, Tennessee. The projects were similar (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2362) in that they :

• each are "an extension of the downtown revitalization effort";
• "have the goals of creation of favourable people- and place-based outcomes";
• "mobilised by a belief in the proposition that concentrated poverty is unhealthy"; and
• private stakeholders...need to be persuaded to invest in the target areas".

Durham failed in a spectacular way, including public scandals and the total revamping of the Durham Housing Authority (DHA). Two reasons were given:

• the DHA "did not have the skill sets or capacity necessary" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2366); and
• "there was clearly less political will on the part of the public or private sectors to focus on the expressed goal of poverty amelioration" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2367).

Chattanooga apparently succeeded by changing the property value of the area, but significantly only for those who moved into the neighborhood. Original residents remained poor or were driven out by higher property taxes or incentive to sell at higher, gentrified, prices. The authors note that "many of the public-sector actors in Chattanooga were the private-sector actors" including the fact that two successive mayors of Chattanooga at the time were "both private-sector developers who own a great deal of downtown property" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, p. 2372). "Greater capacity through unity...could guarantee the place-based success of mixed-income changes" (Fraser & Kick, 2007, pp. 2372-3).

The central criticism of the piece is, "mixed-income housing, successes for whom?" (Fraser, J. C. & Kick, E. L., 2007, p. 2373). The answer as to whether revitalization efforts are successful depends on whether the focus is on the place (buildings, roads, and cable TV) or on actual real-live people.

Reference: Fraser, J. C., & Kick, E. L. (2007). The Role of Public, Private, Non-profit and Community Sectors in Shaping Mixed-income Housing Outcomes in the US. Urban Studies, 44 (12), 2357-2377.

Review: The Nature of Cities

The Nature of Cities is a documentary which explores ways in which nature can be integrated into urban landscapes to reduce energy consumption, improve health, inspire curiosity, and build community (not to mention reconnecting urban dwellers to the nature around them).

The film takes us to locations around the US and Europe, including Austin, New York, San Diego and cities in Sweden, The Netherlands and France. Each location has a story to tell about how the community is improved by adopting "regenerative systems."

Austin contributes stories about how the transportation department designed bridges to encourage bat habitation and the reaction of city dwellers to having a million bats living within their midst (I assure you, it's positive!) and a native plant garden which is helping restore the landscape. San Diego's canyons, saved from development due to steep terrain and flooding streams, are nature preserves which can bring people from diverse neighborhoods together for recreational purposes.

The European cities contribute stories about green roof designs which extend the life of the building, manage rainwater, and reduce building heating costs. There are communities which have managed to reduce their dependence on automobiles, which allows those developments to turn the streets into gardens and playgrounds. One development retains a forested area which is far more used than a standard playground because it is more interesting with more things to explore and discover.

The video is a survey, certainly not a how-to, but it does provide food for thought. I would encourage viewers to look at the various design elements to think about what kinds of things appeal to them. The ideas presented are site-specific, and there shouldn't be a need to replicate them precisely. But, for instance, where there is a water feature fed by captured rainwater which otherwise be a flooding hazard, should it have a waterfall? What kinds of plants would you want to keep the water clean and provide an attractive space? Critically important: what would make it fun for the kids?

Below is a short preview of the movie. For those of you lucky enough to have access to the regional university libraries, it is available for checkout.



The DVD is available for $24.95 for individuals at the Throughline Productions web site.

References
Davis, C., Beatley, T., Kellert, S. R., Louv, R., Oblinger, M., Throughline Productions (Firm), & Electric Lodge (Firm). (2009). The nature of cities. Boulder, Colo.: Throughline Productions.

Four the Future - September 4

Today: the regional incinerator, recycling, root cellars, and a regional sustainability partnership.

• City incinerator a hot topic
  Source: Spokesman-Review; September 4, 2010
  Summary: The contract for the region’s waste incinerator will be over soon, so a decision will have to be made for its future. Operating costs are competitive with other cities and counties at $98 per ton. The bond that paid for its construction will be paid off in 2011, so its cost should go down. Regional leaders are discussing changes to its governance structure. The regional solid waste plan calls for its continued use, and the plan has been approved by Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Valley, Millwood, and the palouse towns. There has been concern in the environmental community about the greenhouse gases being released by the incinerator. However, a recent study shows that landfills produce more GHGs than incinerators.
  Opinion: Only Liberty Lake and the west plains cities (Medical Lake, Airway Heights and Cheney) have yet to approve of the plan. There was a serious battle over the construction of the incinerator and current County Commissioner Bonnie Mager was opposed to it. The plant is currently past capacity. Recycling could have a major impact on the ongoing cost and volume of waste disposal. Fortunately....
• Food scraps: They're not garbage anymore!
  Source: Spokane County Solid Waste
  Summary: Spokane County residents can now place food scraps into their “clean green” bins to be composted, rather than incinerated. Significantly, you may now recycle: Fruit and vegetable scraps, meat, fish, poultry, and bones, and bread, pasta and grains. The full list is available at the link above.
  Opinion: The more we reuse, the less we need to ship in from other places. It makes our region most resilient to economic changes in other regions, and expands a resource (compost) for use in our area. As we move closer and closer to a single stream recycling system, recycling rates should increase because it will become more convenient to do so.
• Living Green newsletters
  Source: SNAP; September/October 2010
  Summary: SNAP produces a bimonthly newsletter to help people live more sustainable lives. You can sign up for it by visiting the link above. In the latest edition, it talks about food preservation and storage, canning, institutional composting, and more.
  Opinion: Monitoring newsletters like these can give you ideas about how other people live their lives. You might even pick up a tip or two! In this case, the newsletter sings the praises of root cellars. Since they are part of a structure, building codes must be aware of their existence and accommodate them. Planners must be aware of what kinds of activities people engage in to make sure that they do not interfere with the proactive steps that everyday people take. As societies change, planners must attempt anticipate the neighborhood’s future so neighborhood plans are more than documents on a shelf, but, instead, living documents which support the communities they intend to serve.
• A Future Built on Different Standards
  Source: New York Times; September 2, 2010
  Summary: The province of Styria, Austria, is experiencing an economic boom as a result of a sustainable business strategy. They are promoting their region through green products. It’s a coalition of 79 municipalities for branding the region, and an incentives system for achieving ecological excellence. Foods are produced locally, and buildings use solar power and recycle waste heat. The entire region intends to be fossil fuel free by 2025.
  Opinion: These people have discovered that if they live sustainably, they don’t need to depend on people from the outside for their survival. At the same time, they’re making a branding program which allows them to create a regional identity, which attracts more people who hold the same values. And what better way to make a sustainable community than through the positive feedback of living with people with your same values?

Four the Future - August 30

Today: moratorium abuse, downsizing housing, Sustainable September's Mariah McKay, and new automobile window stickers.

• Lake Whatcom building ban extended another 6 months
  Source: The Bellingham Herald; August 11, 2010
  Summary: The Whatcom County Council passed a resolution extending a 5-year old building moratorium in a portion of Lake Whatcom's watershed. Lake Whatcom is the water supply for half of the county. The moratorium is preventing the construction of up to 200 homes. The council is attempting to put a workable transfer of development rights proposal in place.
  Opinion: Moratoria are complex. If you announce you're going to have a moratorium or that rules are going to change in any way, people can subvert the process by filing for a development permit which is protected from rule changes under the state's vesting laws. So, state law recognizes that they are put in place with very limited or no public notice, but limits them to six months to permit time to have the public conversation necessary to put suitable rules in place. However, they can be extended without limit. Five years is ridiculous; it's easy to argue it's an abuse of power. More likely, however, is that they don't know what their plan is, so they can't make progress. I believe that the law regarding moratoria should be amended so that any extension past six months from the initial moratorium require that there have been a public hearing on a proposed work plan to end the moratorium. This shows accountability to the public, and makes the legislative authority demonstrate that it understands that the power to place nonstatutory moratoria is not unlimited. Even without a current obligation to do so, their planning department should present one for adoption by the county council anyway.
• Tiny houses simpler, easier on the environment
  Source: Missoulian; August 28, 2010
  See Also: Four the Future - August 29
  Summary: For 55 years, American houses grew larger and larger, peaking in 2007 at 2,521 square feet. This compares to the average of 800 sq. ft. in the original modern subdivision, Levittown, just after World War II. This was despite a steady decrease in the family size. In the same way it's becoming more fashionable to own a Mini Cooper than a Ford Expedition, there's a new trend to make homes smaller. However, governments make it difficult to build smaller houses.
  Opinion: Looking back, this now seems inevitable. The growth of house size followed the growth of the boomers and their parents. When their parents downsized, the sheer number of boomers hid the trend. Now that the boomers are looking to downsize, so, too, is the average house size. Governments which were at first enrolled to "protect the investment" of the boomers by forbidding smaller units now have the duty to start allowing the boomers to downsize by allowing smaller, more efficient,less costly living spaces for everyone.
• Face Time: Nonprofit employee talks about sustainability
  Source: The Spokesman-Review; August 30, 2010
  
  
  
  Summary: The Spokesman-Review interviews Mariah Rose McKay about the upcoming Sustainable September events next month. Over 100 events are planned, and more are being added. Many events are free.
  Opinion: There is a full calendar at the web site. Sustainability allows us to live a life which won't be taken away from us due to lack of resources or foresight. Its alternative, embracing the inability to be resilient in the face of challenges, is simply defeatist. So, how do we live an intentionally wise life? Education. And this is a great way to do it. Thank you, Community-Minded Enterprises, and especially the dynamically resilient Mariah.
• E.P.A. Develops Grading System for New Car Stickers
  Source: New York Times; August 30, 2010
  Summary: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Transportation (DOT) has designed new auto window stickers to help consumers compare vehicles. Rather than comparing vehicles against others in their class, now all vehicles will be compared against all over vehicles, and assigned a composite letter grade. Vehicles will get a grade between D and A+. No failing grades will be issued. Vehicles will also be compared based on mileage, annual cost of fueling, greenhouse emissions and other air pollutants.
  Opinion: There is a whole range of colored labels for vehicles. Samples are available at the EPA web site (PDF, 16MB). The labels include several measures by which a consumer may judge a vehicle. This is important because hybrids treat fuel differently. If you're driving short distances, you may not use any fuel at all, so how do you compare that to a gasoline-only vehicle? Having multiple measures helps with that. I also support that there are no failing grades. "Failure" means that it shouldn't be allowed on the road at all. That's what emissions testing is for. But, let's not fool ourselves. Most SUV's get a C, and the highest grade any minivan gets is a C+, because of their inefficiency for single occupancy travel. If Americans were better at trip planning and sharing rides, that would make them more palatable. Carpool, anyone?